Frequently Asked Questions

If you have questions about the competition, questions that arise after reading the summary of the proposals for each site, you can contact us through this form. We will answer you as soon as possible. We will also put at your disposal on this page the questions we receive, along with their answers, so that other participants can consult them.

IMPORTANT: THIS IS AN ANONYMOUS FORUM. PLEASE, DO NOT REVEAL ANY DATA THAT COULD LINK YOUR NAME TO THE REGISTRATION CODE

All the documents can be uploaded to the Competition website before February 4th, 2025 at 7:00 pm (Madrid time). The registration platform will be enabled until then. You can also send any query taking into account this deadline.

No, since in all three locations the intervention area is open access or the buildings are in a state of ruin, so safety during visits cannot be guaranteed.

No, it is not necessary.

Each team will have a maximum of 4 associate members, who will be considered authors of the project. In addition to this number, each team may have several collaborators, who are not considered coauthors of the project, but it is understood that they have contributed to its realization.

Yes, an architecture studio can be presented as the author of a project instead of the architects presenting themselves individually. If, on the contrary, the contestants prefer to appear as authors in a personal way, they would have to limit their number to four, which is the maximum number of authors allowed by the competition terms and conditions. The fifth architect would have to appear only as a collaborator.

The winning projects are intended to be built. And for that purpose, among other criteria, the proposals should meet feasibility in both technical and economic terms. In any case, this competition cannot guarantee their final implementation, which will depend on the local administrations, to whose disposition the winning proposals will remain.

There are no official reference prices. In any case, only a very basic estimation of the main budget items is required.

Each team can send an entry for the location they prefer, or for more than one if they decide to do so and find it feasible. In this last case, they will have to register independently for each of them.

No, neither one nor the other is necessary to participate.

To add an additional collaborator it will be necessary to complete the registration form again to obtain a new code. This means that, from that point on, they will function as a new team.

If the teams are for different locations, it is allowed. However, it is not permitted to be part of more than one team for the same location.

Teams may include any material they deem appropriate, although ideally, it should be limited to the most representative views and/or drawings of the proposal.

Since, in the event of winning and the proposal being executed, any architect not licensed in Spain would likely need to collaborate with an architect licensed in this country, holding a university degree in architecture is sufficient to participate in the competition.

Yes, individual participation is fully allowed.

Yes, it is allowed; however, it’s important to remember that one of the evaluation criteria for proposals will be the extent to which they promote “the use of traditional, reusable construction techniques and materials specific to the region.”

We do not have detailed plans of the old winepress that is the focus of the intervention, but its general dimensions can easily be deduced from the remaining structural elements. Although the building is in a ruined state, these elements can be recovered and integrated into the proposal, should participants deem it appropriate. Regarding the cave’s characteristics, particularly the location of its entrance, we have requested more detailed information from the municipal authority. If provided, this information will be promptly shared with all participants.

Although it is not part of the proposed intervention, you may, if deemed appropriate, suggest a reconfiguration of the façades of the existing houses facing the street. However, you must bear in mind that, should the project be implemented, the proposed reconfiguration of these façades cannot be carried out, as these houses are privately owned.

Since it is a building and not a cellar or auxiliary structure, its roof must be constructed with ceramic tiles, as mentioned in the project specifications.

In general, various solutions can be proposed, as long as the existing public pathways are respected.

Each team may intervene in the interior of Casa Dolantxea as they deem appropriate, but solutions that respect the structural and volumetric configuration of the existing building should be prioritized whenever possible.

While municipal regulations do not specify the materials to be used for the interior of the building, the competition’s evaluation criteria apply to the proposal as a whole, which must align with these criteria and not solely with the building’s external appearance.

Using traditional techniques and materials as much as possible in defining the proposal is not incompatible with including an elevator or any other necessary element.

Yes, but the priority is to address the competition’s requirements.

The following links provide access to a viewer that includes a 3D representation of both the general intervention area and the church and the adjacent building that is the focus of the intervention:
3D Intervention area.
3D Church and adjacent building.

The housing is primarily intended to be rental accommodation for young people, as indicated in the guidelines, rather than a hostel-style solution.

These are privately owned lots where houses may be built in the future, so they should not be incorporated into streets.

Yes, as long as the intervention is coherent, feasible, and respects the existing topography without altering its character.

Yes, if required for the proposal, but preserving the maximum number of trees is preferred.

Participants may use the techniques and materials they consider appropriate, although those that respect the local architectural tradition are especially valued.

We do not have information on whether additional buildings are planned in that area.

It is possible to propose another use if deemed appropriate in the proposal, but this area was initially designated as the space for the community garden.